Review any talent contract in under 60 seconds. Find hidden risks. Check every clause against what you actually agreed.
Deterministic matching - same contract in, same answer out. Not AI guesses. No hallucinations.
Creators should create. Managers should hustle - careers, deals, revenue. CBA handles the contracts.
Every other option for reviewing a talent contract has a structural flaw. Manual review burns hours. Generic AI hallucinates. Legal tech platforms cost six figures. CBA is purpose-built for the deals creators and their teams actually face.
| Capability | Manual reviewCreator & team | Copy-paste AIChatGPT / Claude | Legal tech platformse.g. Ironclad | ContractBuddyPurpose-built |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Under 60 seconds per contract | ~ | |||
| Pre-agreed terms reconciliation | ~ | |||
| Trained on real talent contracts | — | |||
| Same input always gives same output | ||||
| No hallucinations | ||||
| Full audit trail of every decision | ||||
| Your data not used to train shared models | ||||
| Cost | £0 software, hours of time | £20-30/mo | £20k-100k+/yr | From £19.99/mo |
Pre-agreed terms in. Contract in. A structured, risk-rated, plain English summary out. Every flag is backed by a specific rule in our industry library, every result is reproducible, every decision is logged.
A typical talent contract takes 3-5 hours of focused work: read, mark up, negotiate, sign off. Plus the days of back-and-forth in between. ContractBuddy compresses the focused work into minutes and accelerates the calendar time.
Every plan gets the same engine. Tier choice is about how many contracts you need each month, not which features you get.
Talent managers know talent managers. Creators know creators. Find a tool that saves hours per contract, and word travels.
Generic AI guesses at legal conclusions. CBA doesn't guess. It matches every clause against a rule-based library built from real talent deals. Explainable results you can actually act on.The CBA difference